I
recognized elements of de Certeau’s “Walking in the City” as I watched Up the Yangtze. Primarily I saw de Certeau’s idea of the “voyeur”
and the “walker”. A voyeur is elevated
and “put at a distance” (1343). I saw
the tourists in the documentary as being voyeurs. There is a distance put between them and the
Chinese culture that they seemingly want to experience. The walkers, “whose bodies follow the thicks
and thins of an urban ‘text’ they write without being able to read it”, are the
Chinese people in the movie who go about their business day by day without
really taking a look around them (1344).
They are part of the city, but they don’t recognize other people besides
themselves. There were different
economic classes present in the movie, but even the Chinese people themselves
did not fully realize what conditions Yu Shui lived in. Neither group of people is completely aware
of their surroundings even though they think they know and understand what they
see. Therefore neither group is
completely useful in creating an operational city concept. If the two groups combined, they’d create a
people that is able to be a part of the current culture as well as view the
surroundings in order to be aware of the cultures around them.
De
Certeau would see Chang as presenting a China that “constructs the fiction that
creates readers, makes the complexity of the city readable” (1344). The tourists would be the readers. The workers on the cruise ship are making a
complex city more understandable to the tourists who are only there for a small
amount of time. It’s difficult to
capture the essence of a city that has a long history when you only have a few
days to find the essence. The tourists
are surprised by how modern the city is, because they associate China with an
ancientness only presented to them in books.
The workers on the cruise ship play into that representation of China by
allowing the tourists to try on ancient costume.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.