I’ll preface this blog by saying that I don’t like horror
movies. I get too scared so I don’t
watch them. However, I’m a big fan of Joss Whedon (co-writer and director), and
there has been so much buzz about The
Cabin in the Woods that I had to wiki it to read what happens. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabin_in_the_woods
The reviews I’ve read for this movie have called it a “next-level
genre masterpiece”. “Film critic Roger
Ebert commented ‘The Cabin in the Woods has been constructed almost as a puzzle
for horror fans to solve. Which conventions are being toyed with? Which authors
and films are being referred to? Is the film itself an act of criticism?’” Roger
Ebert’s evaluation immediately made me think of Mitchell’s article “Metapictures”. Mitchell looked at certain pictures as being
able to “refer to themselves or to other pictures, pictures that are used to show
what a picture is” (35). It seems that
this movie is aware of the horror movie conventions and then pushes the limits
or defies the limits of its own genre conventions. In the movie there is a
group of college kids who stay at a cabin.
They don’t know that there are people (technicians or puppeteers)
watching them and releasing certain horror elements for these people to deal
with. These technicians have a slew of
monsters (zombies, werewolves, vampires, etc) locked up and will release them
based on the actions of the college kids.
The college kids find a bunch of artifacts that are usually typical
catalysts of horror movies (aka pendants, a diary of spells, Pandora ’s Box,
etc). Certain monsters will be released depending on which artifact a person
chooses. The technicians have fun within the limits betting on who will choose which
artifact. The technicians are also very
aware of the fact that each college student represents a different type (aka
the whore, the athlete, the virgin, etc).
The film has an awareness of itself through the technicians who are
producing all the action and through one of the college students who is aware
that something horror-like is happening.
The film also references other horror films through the artifacts that are
typically used in this genre of film.
Mitchell’s article looked at Valasquez’s Las Meninas as the prime example of a
metapicture. Mitchell says that “the
formal structure of Las Meninas is an
encyclopedic labyrinth of pictorial self-reference, representing the interplay
between the beholder, the producer, and the object or model of representation”
(58). Roger Ebert has also commented
that The Cabin in the Woods is a “puzzle”. I can see just from the description on Wikipedia
that there are complex levels to the movie. There ae levels of the college students, the technicians, the director who is in charge of the technicians, and the ancient ones (which is the reason that the technicians are toying with the college students).
The writers of The Cabin in the
Woods understand and mastered the horror genre in order to be able to break
the frame and play with the idea of an agent (the technicians) knowingly acting
in the name of the horror genre.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.